I
was always engulfed by a question on why academic and scholastic papers demand Times New Roman as a standard font, and why
many publishers abide by it comprehensively.
While
many of us ignore the type of font used in any piece of writing - with that
typical intent of focusing only on content and not on how it appears visually- scientifically,
it has been witnessed that the visual appearance of the fonts generate much influence
on how a document is received as equally as the content itself. Such scientific
concepts and knowledge of font designs were conceived by the ancient premier
publishing and printing houses many moons ago. And subsequently, the design of any
fonts was considered very seriously on the basis of how it can produce mood
and atmosphere, besides being readable and economical at large.
Before
the period of global digitalization, history has it that, the only fonts
available in the Microsoft Windows 3.1 were Ariel,
Courier and Times New Roman. In the 1930s, the British based newspaper The Times used a font named ‘Times’, which
shortly gathered massive criticism by Stanley Morrison, a native typographer,
for being badly printed and typographically antiquated. The Times has asked Morison to design a better font in which the
later with the help of an esteemed advertising designer, Victor Lardent
conceptualized the new design of Times
Old Roman (the font name referred after the new design) based on 2 major
changes:
a)
Readability: Morison and Lardent has
reduced the space between each letter (technically called tracking) to make it condensed and
readable, besides thinning the intersections of the thicker strokes of each
letter to give it a legible look.
b)
Efficiency: As a necessity in the
newspaper business, to make it more economical, the number of words to fit on each
line and thus on a page was maximized.
Later,
this new font made its debut in the issue of The Times on 3rd
October 1932 and was popularly branded as Times
New Roman thereafter. History has recorded that this font was tested by the
‘distinguished ophthalmic authority’ under the conditions of both natural and artificial
light, and confirmed as the most readable font.
So
what makes Times New Roman a standard
font for academia in most cases?
One
good reason could be its ubiquitousness. Microsoft has included it
before the early digitalization and later made it the default font for being a widely used typeface across all space. So basically, Times New Roman was the granddaddy of the print fonts. Also, this font
was readable in the sense that it allowed the readers to stay on the line of text or
paragraphs for a longer period of time without any difficulty. As much as
academic papers are published with the intent to express some findings and
impart new knowledge to the readers, fonts such as Times New Roman is more apt and convincing to achieve such academic
commitments.
No comments:
Post a Comment